networking-forum.com
Community BlogCommunity Wiki * Register  * Search  * Login
View unanswered postsView active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:42 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:54 am
Posts: 57
Is there anyway to block a DDOS attack? I dont know to much about DDOS attacks and how they work, but i think i understand a little bit of it. Is there no way to configure a firewall to detect rapid, spontaneous, continuous amounts of fragmented, random data coming from an IP address? Wouldn't the data coming in from a DDOS server be somewhat distinct from data that flows normally?

Any info would be greatly appreciated!

_________________
I want to work with the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and standardize a WTF protocol. It would literally be a "What The F**k" protocol for when NO ONE can figure out where the f**k something went wrong.

Non-Cisco forum http://networkinghelp.freeforums.org/index.php


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:05 pm 
Offline
Ultimate Member
Ultimate Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 713
Location: Singapore
Certs: CCNA, CCDA, CCNA-SECURITY
yes. as per my response to your firewall post,
a firewall can do this or an IDS/IPS device.

usually though DDOS attacks don't happen to a home user. they are usually targeted towards large companies or service providers. not that that means it cant happen, its just odd.

are you being victimized by one now? or do you think someone on your network is infected and is being used as part of one?

_________________
CCNA, CCDA, CCNA-SECURITY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:22 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:54 am
Posts: 57
I use my PC at home as a game server. I host a video game server, someone causing trouble in the server gets banned from the server, they get mad, they try to get revenge via DDOS. It happens to so many people. And i have been a victim before.

_________________
I want to work with the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and standardize a WTF protocol. It would literally be a "What The F**k" protocol for when NO ONE can figure out where the f**k something went wrong.

Non-Cisco forum http://networkinghelp.freeforums.org/index.php


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:46 pm 
Offline
Ultimate Member
Ultimate Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 713
Location: Singapore
Certs: CCNA, CCDA, CCNA-SECURITY
ah yes.
makes sense.

_________________
CCNA, CCDA, CCNA-SECURITY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:02 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:54 am
Posts: 57
yeah. I hoping that i can config a firewall to block stuff like that kind of stuff.

_________________
I want to work with the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and standardize a WTF protocol. It would literally be a "What The F**k" protocol for when NO ONE can figure out where the f**k something went wrong.

Non-Cisco forum http://networkinghelp.freeforums.org/index.php


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:58 am 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:42 pm
Posts: 133
Distributed Denial of Service*

Because you haven't made an attempt at posting literately I'm not going to make the effort to answer your post, apart from that remark correcting your terrible spelling and this one explaining it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:16 am 
Offline
Ultimate Member
Ultimate Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 713
Location: Singapore
Certs: CCNA, CCDA, CCNA-SECURITY
shapeshifter wrote:
Distributed Denial of Service*

Because you haven't made an attempt at posting literately I'm not going to make the effort to answer your post, apart from that remark correcting your terrible spelling and this one explaining it.



angry much?

if you dont have something nice/useful to say than.....

_________________
CCNA, CCDA, CCNA-SECURITY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 1:42 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:42 pm
Posts: 133
kerpap wrote:
angry much?

if you dont have something nice/useful to say than.....


Not particularly.. Just here for my own amusement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:31 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:54 am
Posts: 57
I think we just found the forum troll!

+5 points for me!

_________________
I want to work with the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and standardize a WTF protocol. It would literally be a "What The F**k" protocol for when NO ONE can figure out where the f**k something went wrong.

Non-Cisco forum http://networkinghelp.freeforums.org/index.php


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:37 pm 
Offline
Ultimate Member
Ultimate Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 713
Location: Singapore
Certs: CCNA, CCDA, CCNA-SECURITY
troll.

_________________
CCNA, CCDA, CCNA-SECURITY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:38 pm 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:57 pm
Posts: 10
one single ip address or range? if so contact the abuse department that owns that block.

no clue on a cisco device level yet sorry but when I was working for a webhost this was the first thing to do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:17 am 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:54 am
Posts: 57
I found that many new firewalls you can buy have a anti DOS feature specifically built in. Im guna get one and see how it works.

_________________
I want to work with the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and standardize a WTF protocol. It would literally be a "What The F**k" protocol for when NO ONE can figure out where the f**k something went wrong.

Non-Cisco forum http://networkinghelp.freeforums.org/index.php


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 2:49 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 2:15 pm
Posts: 8278
Location: Frederick MD
Certs: Instanity
you need to work with your ISP, the ideas is to stop the saturation of your circuit, this needs to be done upstream.
dropping packets at the near end router is useless to stop a DDOS, the circuit will still be saturated with disruptive packets
so call your ISP, work with them to resolve the DDOS.

_________________
"If you're good at anticipating the human mind. It leaves nothing to chance."
-Jigsaw


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:54 am
Posts: 57
yeah, i was afraid of that. I might call me ISP and see what they have to offer in terms of help with DDOS. However, light DOS mitigation wouldnt be a bad thing to have. Also, i thought about IPv6. isn't IPv6 designed with security in mind? I was talking with someone and they said that IPv6 could help protect against packet forging and what not. Would it be worth it to go IPv6?

_________________
I want to work with the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and standardize a WTF protocol. It would literally be a "What The F**k" protocol for when NO ONE can figure out where the f**k something went wrong.

Non-Cisco forum http://networkinghelp.freeforums.org/index.php


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:51 pm 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 220
Location: VA
Certs: CCNP CCIP CCNA-S
IPv4 is every bit as secure as IPv6 thanks in part to RFC 3514.

http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3514.html

:whistle:

_________________
_______________________________________________________________________
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 8:34 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:54 am
Posts: 57
I was told in my CCNA networking fundamentals class that IPv4 was never originally designed with security in mind, but security features were added later. I was also told that IPv6 was designed with security in mind from the very start. I guess i assumed that it would be a little more secure because of that.

_________________
I want to work with the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and standardize a WTF protocol. It would literally be a "What The F**k" protocol for when NO ONE can figure out where the f**k something went wrong.

Non-Cisco forum http://networkinghelp.freeforums.org/index.php


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:22 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:01 pm
Posts: 5148
Location: Canada eh
Certs: 350-001, CCNP, CXFF, ITILv3F
cheesepuff wrote:
I was told in my CCNA networking fundamentals class that IPv4 was never originally designed with security in mind, but security features were added later. I was also told that IPv6 was designed with security in mind from the very start. I guess i assumed that it would be a little more secure because of that.

I was told not to listen to everything I hear.

The bottom line is that something that is not configured properly is likely at risk and something that has been well thought out and configured correctly only carries as much risk as the yet to be found vulnerabilities in the code running it carries.

_________________
blog.brokennetwork.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:29 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:45 am
Posts: 1639
Location: Arizona
Certs: CCNA
So, what about TCP Interrupt options..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 11:09 pm 
Offline
Ultimate Member
Ultimate Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 713
Location: Singapore
Certs: CCNA, CCDA, CCNA-SECURITY
keep in mind it is a game server he is running which makes it a bit tricky to thwart a DDoS.

could set connection limits but without denying users to login legitimately.

@Cheesepuff, do you know what type of attack is being unleashed?

SYN flood?, massive pings?

_________________
CCNA, CCDA, CCNA-SECURITY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:03 am 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:54 am
Posts: 57
@Infinite It was my professor who told me that, so i would hope he knew what he was talking about.

@kerpap I'm not sure. When i look at my network bandwidth meter, it doesn't go up much during the DOS attack, but i lose connection to everything.

_________________
I want to work with the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and standardize a WTF protocol. It would literally be a "What The F**k" protocol for when NO ONE can figure out where the f**k something went wrong.

Non-Cisco forum http://networkinghelp.freeforums.org/index.php


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group