networking-forum.com
Community Blog • Community Wiki * Register  * Search  * Login
View unanswered posts • View active topics

Board index » Cisco Networking » Cisco Routing and Switching

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Vito_Corleone
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 12:17 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:38 am
Posts: 9390
Location: Orlando, FL
Certs: CCNP RS, CCNP DC, CCDP, CCIP
Sepiraph wrote:
Yes you can use a OSPF-based DMVPN, but it wouldn't scale as well as a EIGPP-based DMVPN.


I disagree. Why do you say that?

_________________
http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com
Top
 Profile  
 
Phenom01
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 12:27 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:30 am
Posts: 139
Certs: A+
ristau5741 wrote:
Phenom01 wrote:
The book i'm reading says that when using the command "router ospf <1 - 65535> the process-ID is meaningless. What gives? If it's meaningless, then why is it there?



process id differentiates between OSPF processes, if you were running multiple instances of OSPF, how could the routers tell the difference to which instance they belong?

Why would you want to run more than one instance?
Top
 Profile  
 
mellowd
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 12:56 pm 
Offline
CCIE #38070
CCIE #38070
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:49 am
Posts: 12424
Location: London, UK
Certs: CCIE ,CC-NP/IP, JNCIP-SP, JNCIS-ENT, BC-/SPNE/NP
Phenom01 wrote:
ristau5741 wrote:
Phenom01 wrote:
The book i'm reading says that when using the command "router ospf <1 - 65535> the process-ID is meaningless. What gives? If it's meaningless, then why is it there?



process id differentiates between OSPF processes, if you were running multiple instances of OSPF, how could the routers tell the difference to which instance they belong?

Why would you want to run more than one instance?


Many reasons. One of the primary reasons is when you're running vrfs and each vrf needs it's own OSPF process

_________________
www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie/
Top
 Profile  
 
burnyd
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 3:41 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:15 pm
Posts: 1947
Location: Pittsburgh
Certs: CCIE R&S,CCIP,JNCIA,VCP510
eigrp in 90% of our datacenters.

_________________
"I will prepare and some day my chance will come." - Abraham Lincoln
http://danielhertzberg.wordpress.com - I blog about networks!
Top
 Profile  
 
Sepiraph
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 3:49 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 4:15 am
Posts: 244
Location: Canada
Certs: CCNA:Sec/CCNP/CCDP/CCIP
Vito_Corleone wrote:
Sepiraph wrote:
Yes you can use a OSPF-based DMVPN, but it wouldn't scale as well as a EIGPP-based DMVPN.


I disagree. Why do you say that?


From the Cisco DMVPN Design doc, they quoted 400 neighbors for EIGRP while 50 for OSPF, they made indirect reference to the more computational-intensive nature of OSPF + additional overhead of encryption and NHRP:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/DMVPN_2_Phase2.html#wp38089

Also Ivan made some comment here, specifically:

Quote:
All spokes have to be in the same area as they are connected to the same subnet (which is why OSPF over DMVPN does not scale) and thus they get all intra-area information.

The only trick you could use would be flood filters on the hub http://wiki.nil.com/OSPF_flooding_filte ... nvironment but then you need static default routes on the spokes. OK if you have a non-redundant setup, "slightly" harder if you need redundancy.

_________________
"It can also be argued that DNA is nothing more than a program designed to preserve itself. Life has become more complex in the overwhelming sea of information. And life, when organized into species, relies upon genes to be its memory system."
Top
 Profile  
 
Vito_Corleone
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:30 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:38 am
Posts: 9390
Location: Orlando, FL
Certs: CCNP RS, CCNP DC, CCDP, CCIP
Hmm, that makes some sense. I'm surprised about the highness of the EIGRP number, as well as how low the ospf number is.

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

_________________
http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com
Top
 Profile  
 
ciscodisco
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:03 pm 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:40 am
Posts: 2
Location: Yorkshire
Certs: EX-CCNA, CCNP, CCNA Security Trained
Hello, You are always best to keep it simple why use 2 protocols when 1 will work? EIGRP is kind of the better protocol but it’s not vendor neutral which could lead to some serious costs if you stop using Cisco equipment. For this reason OSPF is usually the preferred choice.

However EIGRP does have advantages. For example; if you are using AppleTalk or IPX because OSPF doesn’t support these as they are both legacy protocols. In fact does anybody still use these? Also OSPF requires a hierarchal network so you may choose to use both in the transition to OSPF or a new network upgrade.

:woohoo: My first post lol


Last edited by ciscodisco on Mon May 28, 2012 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
mellowd
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:10 pm 
Offline
CCIE #38070
CCIE #38070
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:49 am
Posts: 12424
Location: London, UK
Certs: CCIE ,CC-NP/IP, JNCIP-SP, JNCIS-ENT, BC-/SPNE/NP
Kind of the better protocol?

_________________
www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie/
Top
 Profile  
 
ciscodisco
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:15 pm 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 7:40 am
Posts: 2
Location: Yorkshire
Certs: EX-CCNA, CCNP, CCNA Security Trained
mellowd wrote:
Kind of the better protocol?


I knew someone would pick me up on that lol: Faster Convergence, simpler configuration, route summarisation at none area boundaries. etc.
Top
 Profile  
 
mellowd
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:24 pm 
Offline
CCIE #38070
CCIE #38070
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:49 am
Posts: 12424
Location: London, UK
Certs: CCIE ,CC-NP/IP, JNCIP-SP, JNCIS-ENT, BC-/SPNE/NP
I still think OSPF is far better

_________________
www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie/
Top
 Profile  
 
Steven King
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:39 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:10 pm
Posts: 2509
Location: San Diego, CA
Certs: CCNP, BCNE, Network+, Security+
Mellow is the fact that EIGRP is Cisco-proprietary your only gripe with it?

Personally, I don't have the experience to say the benefits of one over the other, but from my studies so far, I'd go EIGRP if I was a Cisco shop. Maybe the glaring benefits of OSPF haven't really jumped out at me beyond multi-vendor support, which is something else I wouldn't want to have to deal with. I'd rather call one vendor for purchasing/support.

_________________
Regards,

Steven King
San Diego Cisco User Group - http://www.sdcug.com
"The only time something is impossible is when you think it is." - Kevin Corbin, CCIE #11577
Top
 Profile  
 
mellowd
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:43 pm 
Offline
CCIE #38070
CCIE #38070
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:49 am
Posts: 12424
Location: London, UK
Certs: CCIE ,CC-NP/IP, JNCIP-SP, JNCIS-ENT, BC-/SPNE/NP
Not just.

I'll let Doyle do the talking: http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/16276

_________________
www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie/
Top
 Profile  
 
Steven King
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:50 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:10 pm
Posts: 2509
Location: San Diego, CA
Certs: CCNP, BCNE, Network+, Security+
Darn you for making me read. Thanks though; I've been looking for good info in regards to EIGRP vs. OSPF.

_________________
Regards,

Steven King
San Diego Cisco User Group - http://www.sdcug.com
"The only time something is impossible is when you think it is." - Kevin Corbin, CCIE #11577
Top
 Profile  
 
Steven King
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:53 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 8:10 pm
Posts: 2509
Location: San Diego, CA
Certs: CCNP, BCNE, Network+, Security+
Quote:
But then when your network grows large enough to need some scaling limits, forcing you to finally think about your topology, untangling EIGRP can be daunting. That’s when many operators call a consultant like me, who is happy to come in and implement an EIGRP to OSPF migration project for lots and lots of money. So in that mercenary way I’m quite fond of the protocol.


Lol win. :lol:

_________________
Regards,

Steven King
San Diego Cisco User Group - http://www.sdcug.com
"The only time something is impossible is when you think it is." - Kevin Corbin, CCIE #11577
Top
 Profile  
 
that1guy15
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 8:31 am 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 6:12 pm
Posts: 2066
Location: Texas
Certs: CCNP, CCDP, CCIP
mellowd wrote:
Not just.

I'll let Doyle do the talking: http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/16276

Thanks for the link! I havent seen this post in quite some time.

_________________
http://blog.movingonesandzeros.net/
Top
 Profile  
 
Sepiraph
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:02 am 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 4:15 am
Posts: 244
Location: Canada
Certs: CCNA:Sec/CCNP/CCDP/CCIP
mellowd wrote:
Not just.

I'll let Doyle do the talking: http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/16276


I read that article years ago, but with all the recent developments around ISIS, it is no longer a question of EIGRP versus OSPF, ISIS is back into the picture and no longer just limited to large Service Provider.

_________________
"It can also be argued that DNA is nothing more than a program designed to preserve itself. Life has become more complex in the overwhelming sea of information. And life, when organized into species, relies upon genes to be its memory system."
Top
 Profile  
 
mellowd
 Post subject: Re: Question about EIGRP
PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:32 am 
Offline
CCIE #38070
CCIE #38070
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:49 am
Posts: 12424
Location: London, UK
Certs: CCIE ,CC-NP/IP, JNCIP-SP, JNCIS-ENT, BC-/SPNE/NP
Indeed. And IS-IS will route both v4 and v6 right now (as can OSPFv3 on JUNOS with address families)

But IS-IS gives you authentication without needing that damn crypto license!

_________________
www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie/
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » Cisco Networking » Cisco Routing and Switching

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], tzmueller and 16 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group