networking-forum.com
Community BlogCommunity Wiki * Register  * Search  * Login
View unanswered postsView active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:17 am 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:13 am
Posts: 16
Certs: CCIE
RT1-----RT2-------RT3

RT1 is RR client of RT2, we run label BGP among RT1, RT2 and RT3; MPLS LDP is OK;
RT1 network route 192.168.1.18/32 with MPLS-label 4123, we hope RT2 propagate it to RT3 by its address 192.168.8.2 and swap MPLS-label, however, RT2 just propagate it without any changing(192.168.1.18/32 nexthop 192.168.8.1).

router bgp 65000
bgp router-id 192.168.8.2
address-family ipv4 unicast
!
neighbor 192.168.8.3
remote-as 65000
update-source Loopback0
address-family ipv4 labeled-unicast
next-hop-self
!

!
neighbor 192.168.8.1
remote-as 65000
update-source Loopback0
address-family ipv4 labeled-unicast
route-reflector-client
!
!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:49 am 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:38 am
Posts: 9390
Location: Orlando, FL
Certs: CCNP RS, CCNP DC, CCDP, CCIP
http://www.davidsudjiman.info/2010/05/0 ... reflector/

_________________
http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:23 am 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:13 am
Posts: 16
Certs: CCIE
We use IoS XR 3.9, route-map has been replaced by Route-policy?
By nei route-policy IN, we can change next-hop-self, but BGP can not distribute a new bgp label for the route.
By nei route-policy out, We can not change next-hop-self.....

How can Cisco SRS support Seamless MPLS solution without chaning next-hop-self and swap MPLS label?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:01 pm 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:13 am
Posts: 16
Certs: CCIE
How can Cisco CRS-1 support Seamless MPLS solution by next-hop-self??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:11 pm 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:13 am
Posts: 16
Certs: CCIE
I hope ABR to reflect label IBGP route , modify next-hop-self and distribute new label for the route.
Who can help me? Thanks first....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:17 am 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:13 am
Posts: 16
Certs: CCIE
Any CRS configuration for changing nexthop and mpls label in IBGP?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:14 am 
Offline
CCIE #38070
CCIE #38070
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:49 am
Posts: 12425
Location: London, UK
Certs: CCIE ,CC-NP/IP, JNCIP-SP, JNCIS-ENT, BC-/SPNE/NP
Can't you change the values via a route-map outbound to the reflector clients?

_________________
www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:24 am 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:13 am
Posts: 16
Certs: CCIE
ABR recieves label route from RR client, I hope to change its nexthop to ABR, then ABR should change its label.
I tried to use route-policy(route-map in IOS) to realize it, however i failed;
If i use route-policy to Import direction, ABR can change next-hop-self, but it didn't change label;
If i use route-policy to export direction, ABR can not change next-hop-self, however, in debug bgp policy run the policy had been executed sucessfully.

mellowd wrote:
Can't you change the values via a route-map outbound to the reflector clients?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:03 am 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:13 am
Posts: 16
Certs: CCIE
Any answer available?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:12 am 
Offline
CCIE #38070
CCIE #38070
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:49 am
Posts: 12425
Location: London, UK
Certs: CCIE ,CC-NP/IP, JNCIP-SP, JNCIS-ENT, BC-/SPNE/NP
What does your route-map say about the next-hop? Are you using next-hop address or next-hop peer-address?

I must admit I don't know of a solution as I've not done what you are trying to do

_________________
www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:13 am 
Offline
Ultimate Member
Ultimate Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:10 pm
Posts: 984
Location: Leeds, UK
Certs: CCIE R&S #38338, CCNP, CCIP
Don't be an ass, if you need an answer instantly then a forum isn't the place to get it.

Don't post a follow-up <3hrs after your last post.

You might get some more help as well if you actually describe why you are wanting to do what you are trying to do, it could be that there is a better method.

_________________
---
David
CCIE R&S #38338, CCIP, CCNP

http://networkbroadcast.co.uk - My Blog
http://twitter.com/davidrothera


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:06 am 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:13 am
Posts: 16
Certs: CCIE
I has many Metros interconnected by IP core;
Taditionally, we ran ISIS level-1 in Metro, and ISIS level-2 in IP core;
We used MPLS in Metros and IP core seperatelly, every area in an isolated MPLS domain;

Now, we want to integrated all MPLS domains into a whole MPLS domain. We have to use BGP arrounce route from one Metro to Core and another Metro, and use Label BGP distribute MPLs label over LDP label.

Because all our boxes in a same AS. we want to make ABRs as BGP route reflector, PE in Metro as their clients. when ABR reflect route from its clients to another ABR, it should modify its nexthop self which is reachable from another metro, and distribute a new BGP label(transit BGP label node).

that is requiremetn, can you help me ? Thanks..


davidrothera wrote:
Don't be an ass, if you need an answer instantly then a forum isn't the place to get it.

Don't post a follow-up <3hrs after your last post.

You might get some more help as well if you actually describe why you are wanting to do what you are trying to do, it could be that there is a better method.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:48 am 
Offline
Ultimate Member
Ultimate Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:10 pm
Posts: 984
Location: Leeds, UK
Certs: CCIE R&S #38338, CCNP, CCIP
Ok, to summarise then you have two separate networks essentially and you are wanting to ensure that the label that is sent to the CE's is that of the ABR between the two MPLS networks and not the address of a far end PE in the other network?

_________________
---
David
CCIE R&S #38338, CCIP, CCNP

http://networkbroadcast.co.uk - My Blog
http://twitter.com/davidrothera


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:56 am 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:13 am
Posts: 16
Certs: CCIE
yes.
I got the answer. Cisco add a new command "ibgp policy out enforce-modifications" in order to meet the Seamless MPLS solution.
After i added "ibgp policy out enforce-modifications", next-hop-self took effective for RR.

Thank you very much.



davidrothera wrote:
Ok, to summarise then you have two separate networks essentially and you are wanting to ensure that the label that is sent to the CE's is that of the ABR between the two MPLS networks and not the address of a far end PE in the other network?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jamie, mynd, SofaKing, spivy66, that1guy15, tzmueller and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group